Xiaomi CC9 PRO With 108MP Camera – Complete Specs Now Available.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I prefer thicc and heavy but smaller phones.
The point is, I didn’t even say anything against those who prefer heavier and thicker phones… Man, the level of stupidity is outrageous.
Phone have lots of good specification I think notch is okey
Why are people downvoting u lol
Currently only the Mix 3 has global LTE though (but no band 71)
You cant break something that isn’t there. You can’t break a popup camera mechanism if your front camera is located in a notch
Thanks for coming to my Ted talk
*5, 4, 3, 2…*
Soon there will b a phone with 100 of camera s like no gorilla glass only cameras…
*weeks
>Defiling the rumors of SD855
Defiling? Really?
I’m hoping here with you….. instabuy for me if it has Band 12….there is a sliver of hope because the earlier Note series, I think Mi Note 1 and Mi note 2 had US bands…but I don’t think Note 3 was released outside of China
How many have them? I haven’t gotten a new mix because of the lack of sd slot.
Durability.
why is xiaomi going back to notch, I’m gonna wait for another mi 9t
I know right? I loved the slimness of my A2 and full metal body.
> The pixel binning won’t be 4 (2×2) pixels -> 1 pixel. But 9 (3×3) pixels -> 1 pixel
Oh, that might just work then.
The pixel binning won’t be 4 (2×2) pixels -> 1 pixel. But 9 (3×3) pixels -> 1 pixel
Oh dear a tired old complaint every thread.
Fm radio, ir blaster, nfc and type c is a nice combo.
-6 points for my preference of slick phones over brick ones. Reddits’ collective -minus IQ- hive mind has hit this subreddit too.
Yes. At least in my case, I prefer to have a reliable phone with good battery life, and enough connectivity (3.5mm jack, Micro SD reader, IR blaster if possible) over having a thinner phone lacking Jack and with poor battery.
5 months max
The 108 mp sensor is physically much bigger than the 48mp one, resulting in basically the same pixel size on the sensor.
Yeah, those 100+mp are basically marketing bullshit. But, as long we can get bigger sensor size + better picture quality, I guess it’s alright.
Rumors so far indicate it will have one. Hopefully.
No word of a SD slot
Let the phone come. Then we will see…
Super excited for the Mi Note 10 but I worry about the price compared to the regular CC9. Seems like that sensor is going to be really expensive.
The article says it will be minimum $420ish USD
Super tare
It’s a physically bigger sensor.
It works for the 48MP sensor which results in 12MP images, the sweetspot for smartphones in my opinion.
108 / 4 means 27MP images…which is waay to much for that tiny sensor. I’m still curious, though.
The main problem is the lens. No way a smartphone lens can be of use to a 48MP sensor, albeit a 108MP one. So yeah, it’s just marketing.
This is a 45MP image, no smartphone will ever get this level of detail: [https://streamable.com/bpqjh](https://streamable.com/bpqjh)
If only you could fit 5000mah batteries in thin phones.
Anyways thin phone with cameras double their thickness are worse.
Indeed.
But… pixel binning!
Anyways I’m quite curios to see how this sensor will work , all in all is a very big sensor for a phone.
This is the only real argument on reddit. Someone comment pixel binning and lets start the show!
Am I the only one who enjoys thinner phones over thicker and heavier ones?
In one year, redmi note 14 with 256 MP camera …
That sensor size with OIS (finally).
That battery, tho.
Aw jesus. New model every two months 😆